Die Verselbständigung neoliberaler Wirtschaftspolitik in der EU

Sechs Jahre Krise. Drei Rezessionen. Und jetzt Deflation!

.
Die neoliberale Integrationsweise der EU ist gescheitert, nur ein verschwindender Anteil der Bevölkerung profitiert von ihrer Vertiefung. Dass die tiefe Entdemokratisierung der Grund dafür ist, dass dennoch kein sozialökologischer Umbruch stattfindet, thematisieren Markus Marterbauer und Lukas Oberndorfer.
.
Welchen Anteil daran der Lobbyismus auf EU-Ebene hat, beleuchtet Neva Löw.
.
Elisabeth Beer zeigt, dass die Eliten dies und jenseits des Atlantiks längst daran arbeiten, ihre Erfolge durch Freihandelsabkommen abzusichern und auszubauen.
.
Wettbewerbsfähigkeit nach außen richtet sich immer auch nach innen:
In Spanien werden auf ihrem Altar Arbeitsrecht und soziale Infrastruktur geopfert, so Nikolai Huke und Tobias Haas.
.
Neoliberale Strukturreformen, die jetzt – geht es nach der neuen Kommission – auf alle Euro-Staaten ausgedehnt werden sollen, wie Lukas Oberndorfer zeigt.
.
Was geschehen muss, damit die Europa-2020-Strategie Teil des anstehenden Umbruchs und nicht des „Weiter wie bisher“ wird, erfahren wir von Michael Heiling.
.
aus EU-Infobrief:
Europa und Internationales in kritischer und sozialer Perspektive
arbeitskammer.at

Euro Area — “Deflation” versus “Lowflation”

Euro Area — “Deflation” versus “Lowflation”

By Reza Moghadam, Ranjit Teja, and Pelin Berkmen

.

Recent talk about deflation in the euro area has evoked two kinds of reactions. On one side are those who worry about the associated prospect of prolonged recession. On the other are those who see the risk as overblown. This blog and the video below sift through both sides of the debate to argue the following:

  • Although inflation—headline and core—has fallen and stayed well below the ECB’s 2% price stability mandate, so far there is no sign of classic deflation, i.e., of widespread, self-feeding, price declines.
  • But even ultra low inflation—let us call it “lowflation”—can be problematic for the euro area as a whole and for financially stressed countries, where it implies higher real debt stocks and real interest rates, less relative price adjustment, and greater unemployment.
  • Along with Japan’s experience, which saw deflation worm itself into the system, this argues for a more pre-emptive approach by the ECB.

I. Is there deflation?

Mario Draghi has described deflation in the euro area as a situation where price level declines occur (1) across a significant number of countries; (2) across a significant number of goods; and (3) in a self-fulfilling way.

By this definition, the term “deflation” is arguably overstatement.

First, on geographical scope, recent price changes have been positive in all but 3 countries (versus 12 countries as recently as 2009).

EUR Update_Feb2014_Deflation Blog.002

Second, regarding incidence across goods and services, outright price declines account for only a fifth of the HICP basket — not a high share and, again, no more than in 2009, when the event passed without deflationary consequence.

EUR Update_Feb2014_Deflation Blog.003

Third, is there is a “self-fulfilling” dynamic in the sense that expected future inflation is dragging down current inflation? Here the answer is less obvious. If by expected future inflation we mean longer term rates, then the answer is no: expected inflation 5-10 years out is flat and so could not possibly be the cause of falling current inflation. But if we consider 2-4 year ahead expected inflation, the horizon relevant for many spending decisions and wage negotiations, these are falling and could be affecting current inflation. That said, actual inflation stabilized in February at 0.8%.

EUR Update_Feb2014_Deflation Blog.006

.

II. But if it’s not “deflation”, what’s the problem?

In the current European context, even very low inflation can scupper the nascent recovery and pressure the most fragile countries.

.

Problem #1

Both deflation and less-than-previously-expected inflation increase the real burden of existing debt and the real interest rate that borrowers pay. As it happens, the countries with deflation/low inflation, marked red in the chart below, also happen to be the ones with already higher debt burdens (private + public) and real rates, and include all the countries that have been under market pressure during the crisis.

EUR Update_Feb2014_Deflation Blog.007

.

Problem #2

While deflation/lower inflation in high debt countries is painful to them, at least it improves relative prices, and hence exports and current account sustainability. Unfortunately, when inflation turns low everywhere in the euro area, each unit of deflation/low inflation endured by indebted countries delivers less price adjustment relative to the surplus countries. Or put another way, each point of relative price adjustment must be bought at the cost of greater debt deflation.

.

Problem #3

When demand drops and nominal wages are sticky, the hit to unemployment is cushioned by any on-going inflation, which effectively lowers the real wages that firms pay. That cushion is now badly needed. In Spain, we see in the next chart that, after the crisis, the wage distribution slammed against the zero-barrier, with 30% of the distribution concentrated there. Given sticky nominal wages, near zero inflation in Spain is not helping to resolve the severe unemployment problem there.

EUR Update_Feb2014_Deflation Blog.008

.

III. What are the lessons from Japan’s experience?

There are at least two.

.

Lesson #1

One should not take too much comfort in the fact that long-term inflation expectations are positive (over 2% in the euro area). Long-term inflation expectations on the eve of three deflationary episodes in Japan were also reassuringly positive. But nearer-term expectations turned more pessimistic, feeding into spending and wage decisions and delivering actual deflation. Long-term expectations adjusted too little and too slowly to be a useful guide to monetary policy. The takeaway: notsolong-terminflation expectations, which we saw are falling in the euro area, also need to be given due consideration.

EUR Update_Feb2014_Deflation Blog.009

EUR Update_Feb2014_Deflation Blog.012

.

Lesson #2

One needs to act forcefully before deflation sets in. As shown below, the Bank of Japan was relatively slow in lowering policy rates and ratcheting up base money. In the event, it had to resort to ever-increasing stimulus once deflation set in (shaded grey areas in the second chart). Two decades on, that effort is still ongoing.

EUR Update_Feb2014_Deflation Blog.010

EUR Update_Feb2014_Deflation Blog.013

.

IV. Conclusion

You can have too much of a good thing, including low inflation. Very low inflation may benefit important segments of the population, notably net savers. But in the current context of widespread indebtedness problems, it is working to the detriment of recovery in the euro area, especially in the more fragile countries, where it is thwarting efforts to reduce debt, regain competitiveness and tackle unemployment. The ECB must be sure that policies are equal to the tasks of reversing the downward drift in inflation and forestalling the risk of a slide into deflation. It should thus consider further cuts in the policy rate and, more importantly, look for ways to substantially increase its balance sheet, be it through targeted LTROs or quantitative easing (public and private asset purchases).

.

.

reblogged from IMF

.
.
Vertiefende Gedanken zu

„III. What are the lessons from Japan’s experience?“
finden sich im Blog-Archiv:

  1. Abenomics – Japans neue Wirtschaftspolitik – Teil 1
  2. Abenomics – Japans neue Wirtschaftspolitik – Teil 2
  3. Japan; from quagmire to Abenomics to collapse!
.

korrespondierende Archiv-Beiträge:

.
.

Ihr Oeconomicus


HOW THE ECONOMIC MACHINE WORKS

Economic Cycles

.

Bildrechte: freely licensed – Author: Bernard Ladenthin

.
.

Vereinfachte, aber leicht verständliche Animation mit wesentlichen Funktionen wirtschaftlicher Zusammenhänge!

.
.

30 lohnenswerte Minuten .. versprochen!

.
.

.
.

Ihr Oeconomicus


Der Euro als Qualitätswährung – Bericht zur Bundespressekonferenz mit Prof. Hankel und Hubert Aiwanger

Aiwanger und Hankel sprechen sich für Zweitwährungen zumindest in Krisenländern aus

.Hankel_web

© Oeconomicus (eigene Aufnahme) – frei verwertbar für die Bundespartei Freie Wähler

.
Bei einer Pressekonferenz in Berlin wendeten sich der Bundesvorsitzende der FREIEN WÄHLER Hubert Aiwanger und der international renommierte Währungsexperte und „Vater des Bundesschatzbriefes“ Wilhelm Hankel gegen die Merkel’sche Politik des „weiter so!“ und gegen die verantwortungslose Forderung von Eurogegnern nach einem Austritt Deutschlands aus dem Euro aus.
.
Aiwanger und Hankel forderten stattdessen den Euro so attraktiv zu gestalten, dass er nicht länger nur eine „Zonenwährung“ der 17 Euroländern ist, sondern auch weitere Länder der EU, wie z.B. Dänemark, Schweden oder Polen der Währung überhaupt beitreten wollen. Dazu müsste an den Maastrichtkriterien festgehalten werden, nach denen ein Land nicht für die Schulden der anderen in Haftung genommen werden dürfe. Anstatt Schuldengemeinschaft durch ESM müssten deshalb im Bedarfsfall Entschuldungen nach den bewährten Verfahren des Pariser und Londoner Clubs erfolgen.
.
Zweitwährungen, z.B. die Drachme in Griechenland zusätzlich zum Euro würden die Möglichkeit eröffnen, den nötigen Wechselkursspielraum wieder herzustellen und damit Spannungen innerhalb der Eurozone aufgrund der unterschiedlichen Wirtschaftskraft der Mitgliedsstaaten abzubauen. Aiwanger zeigte sich überzeugt, dass die FREIEN WÄHLER bei der Bundestagswahl ein Überraschungsergebnis einfahren werden, da sie einen vernünftigen, proeuropäischen Kurs fahren, der sich deutlich abgrenzt von der lobbygesteuerten Merkelpolitik, der die Spaltung Europas betreibt.
.
Folgt man den Ausführungen von Prof. Hankel werden u.a. auch die ökonomischen Luecken des AfD-Gründers deutlich.
.

Aufzeichnung der Bundespressekonferenz

.
TEIL 1:
.

.
TEIL 2 – Nachfragen der Journalisten
u.a. zu Merkel’s Schulden-Altar, Altschuldenregelungen, Geldmengenausweitung durch Fed, BoE, BoJ, Inflations-/Deflations-Szenarien, Jugendarbeitslosigkeit, etc:

.
Korrespondierende Artikel
.
März 2003 – Deutsche Bundesbank:
WELTWEITE ORGANISATIONEN UND GREMIEN IM BEREICH VON WÄHRUNG UND WIRTSCHAFT
Kapitel zum Pariser und Londoner Club ab Seite 227
PDF [258 Seiten] – sehr zu empfehlen
.
07. März 2011 – Oeconomicus:
Die Vorgeschichte des Euro
.
04. August 2011 – Oeconomicus:
Lebenslügen des Euro
.
10. Juni 2012 – Oeconomicus:
Semantische Abenteuer-WELTen
.
06. März 2013 – GEOLITICO:
Tiefe Einblicke in die politische „Alternative für Deutschland“
.
21. März 2013 – Oeconomicus:
Prof. Wilhelm Hankel: Die Euro-Bombe
.
10.April 2013 – WELT:
Das passiert bei einer Rückkehr zur D-Mark
.
11. April 2013 – Junge Freiheit:
Aiwanger attackiert „Alternative für Deutschland“
.
11. April 2013 – FAZ:
Anti-Euro-Partei wächst rasant
.
12. April 2013 – FREITAG:
Hunderte AfD-Mitglieder zum Parteitag ausgeladen!
.
15:50h: Aktuelle, recht merkwürdige Meldung bei Facebook:
.
afd
.
Ihnen Allen und insbesondere den unkritischen Hosianna-Chören ein angenehmes Wochenende
.

Ihr Oeconomicus


NZZ-Interview mit Marc Faber

NZZ-Interview mit Marc Faber

.
Unbedingt sehens-/hörenswert!
.
NZZ-Interview mit Marc Faber vom 09.02.2013
.
Wiki-Profil
.
Marc Faber’s Blog

THE DEBT-DEFLATION THEORY OF GREAT DEPRESSIONS

THE DEBT-DEFLATION THEORY OF GREAT DEPRESSIONS
BY IRVING FISHER

LC-USZ62-101512 (b&w film copy neg.) No known restrictions on publication.

.
INTRODUCTORY
In Booms and Depressions, I have developed, theoretically and statistically, what may be called a debt-deflation theory of great depressions.
In the preface, I stated that the results „seem largely new,“ I spoke thus cautiously because of my unfamiliarity with the vast literature on the subject. Since the book was published its special conclusions have been widely accepted and, so far as I know, no one has yet found them anticipated by previous writers, though several, including myself, have zealously sought to find such anticipations.
Two of the best-read authorities in this field assure me that those conclusions are, in the words of one of them, „both new and important.“
Partly to specify what some of these special conclusions are which are believed to be new and partly to fit them into the conclusions of other students in this field, I am offering this paper as embodying, in brief, my present „creed“ on the whole subject of so-called „cycle theory.“
My „creed“ consists of 49 „articles“ some of which are old and some new. I say „creed“ because, for brevity, it is purposely expressed dogmatically and without proof. But it is not a creed in the sense that my faith in it does not rest on evidence and that I am not ready to modify it on presentation of new evidence. On the contrary, it is quite tentative. It may serve as a challenge to others and as raw material to help them work out a better product.
Meanwhile the following is a list of my 49 tentative conclusions.
[…]
PDF – [22 Seiten]
.
.

[ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Irving Fisher was one of America’s greatest mathematical economists and one of the clearest economics writers of all time. He had the intellect to use mathematics in virtually all his theories and the good sense to introduce it only after he had clearly explained the central principles in words.
Although he damaged his reputation by insisting throughout the Great Depression that recovery was imminent, contemporary economic models of interest and capital are based on Fisherian principles. Similarly, monetarism is founded on Fisher’s principles of money and prices.]

.
.
Anmerkung
Gerade im Zusammenhang mit den aktuellen Entwicklungen der Finanzkrise erscheint mir dieser fulminante Aufsatz des legendären Irving Fisher sehr empfehlenswert.

Ihr Oeconomicus


The 1930s All Over Again?

The 1930s All Over Again?
Then, as today, societies were uncertain about which model of society to strive for and how to repair monetary systems. Societies bet on the wrong ideas; we may be committing similar mistakes now.
Many people draw parallels between today and the 1930s, labeling this the Great Recession. They note the high unemployment rate, referring not to the mismeasured, official statistic, but to the number more than double that rate, which also accounts for those who dropped out from the labor force and are no longer counted as “unemployed.” Others worry about the deflationary risk, the dollar devaluation, and the status of the U.S. dollar as reserve currency. Still others worry that the “vital few” — those with high scientific aptitudes and entrepreneurial drive — no longer come to or stay in the United States, but stay in or go back to the many countries whose Iron Curtains have been punctured since 1989.
[…]
Essay by Prof. Reuven Brenner [McGill University]THE AMERICAN