Ende des EFSF-Bankenrettungsprogramms
Veröffentlicht: 4. Dezember 2013 Abgelegt unter: Banco Santander, EFSF, S.A., SAREB, Verschuldung | Tags: Bankenrettungsprogramm Ein KommentarDie europäischen Finanzminister haben Mitte November das Ende des spanischen Bankenrettungsprogramms beschlossen – es läuft zum Jahresende aus.
Der EFSF hatte Spanien im Juli 2012 – die Risikoaufschläge auf Staatsanleihen befanden sich auf einem Rekordhoch – 100 Milliarden Euro zur Verfügung gestellt, um im Zuge der Immobilienkrise strauchelnde Kreditinstitute zu stützen.
Von dieser Kreditlinie hat Spanien rund 40 Milliarden Euro in Anspruch genommen.
Zugleich wurden bedeutende Anstrengungen unternommen, den spanischen Finanzsektor zu reformieren.
.
Thomas Bernd Stehling, Dr. Adriaan Kühn – KAS Auslandsbüro Spanien – PDF – [3 Seiten]
.
.
Anmerkung
Schau-mer-mal wann die nächste Horrormeldung aus dem Finanzsektor die Runde macht und wie bspw. die Banco de Santander mit ihren Kreditausfällen, die von Insidern auf ca € 1 Mrd geschätzt werden, umgehen wird.
Daneben wird es auch sicher spannend zu beobachten, wie sich deren Beteiligung an der spanischen bad-bank-Gruppe SAREB (Sociedad de Gestión de Activos procedentes de la Reestructuración Bancaria) entwickeln wird (vgl. Investors- und Shareholders-Liste)
.
Ihr Oeconomicus
.
.
follow-up (Santander), 20.08.2014
.
Moody’s assigns a Aaa.ar debt rating to Banco Santander Rio S.A.
Moody’s Latin America Agente de Calificación de Riesgo S.A. assigned today a B1 global local currency senior debt rating to Banco Santander Rio S.A.’s (Santander Rio) sixth expected issuance of up to ARS 500 million, which will be due in 18 months, and to the seventh expected issuance up to ARS 500 million, which will be due in 36 months, both under the bank’s $500 million medium-term note program. Both expected issuances must not exceed ARS 500 million.
[…]
Moody’s
.
follow-up (Santander), 08.08.2014
.
3 Numbers That Don’t Lie About Banco Santander SA
Any analysis of Banco Santander SA (LSE: BNC) (NYSE: .US) usually focuses on its massive dividend yield and its attractive exposure to Latin America. I’m a big fan of both, but they don’t tell the whole story, especially for UK investors.
In this article, I’ve taken a look at three Santander numbers you may not be familiar with — including one that has the potential to put a serious dent in your investment returns.
[…]
Roland Head
.
.
follow-up (Santander), 31.07.2014
.
.
Santander muss weniger Geld zurücklegen
Faule Kredite fressen weniger Geld bei der spanischen Großbank Santander. Im zweiten Quartal springt der Gewinn in die Höhe. Santander macht es besser als Konkurrent BBVA.
[…]
Handelsblatt
.
.
follow-up (Santander), 31.01.2013
.
Spanische Santander lässt Federn
Im Zuge der Krise in Spanien muss auch die führende Grossbank im Land immer mehr Federn lassen. Der Banco Santander hat im vergangenen Jahr einen Gewinneinbruch von 59% auf 2,2 Mrd. € hinnehmen müssen, wie das Geldhaus am Donnerstag mitteilte. Schuld daran seien vor allem die hohen Rückstellungen für Kreditausfälle, die der Banco Santander, so wie andere Banken in Spanien auch, entsprechend den staatlichen Auflagen vornehmen muss.
[…]
Cornelia Derichsweiler, Madrid, Natalie Gratwohl – NZZ
.
.
follow-up (SAREB), 09.04.2014
.
Spaniens Bad Bank Sareb ändert Darlehens-Vermarktung und -Verkauf
Spaniens Bad Bank will bei der Vermarktung und dem Verkauf fauler Kredite im Wert von 50 Millionen Euro offenbar neue Wege beschreiten. Das könnte internationale Investmentfonds anlocken, die gerne ihr Engagement auf dem spanischen Immobilienmarkt ausbauen würden. Nicht mehr als vier Investmentfirmen sollen in den kommenden Monate ausgewählt werden, die dann den Großteil der Darlehen vermarkten und verkaufen.
[…]
Jeannette Neumann – WSJ
.
.
follow-up (SAREB), 24.11.2013
.
Spanien kehrt Milliarden-Risiko unter den Teppich
Die spanische Bad Bank steht für ein Risiko von mehr als 50 Milliarden Euro. Obwohl der Steuerzahler dafür haftet, muss Spanien das Risiko nicht als Staatsverschuldung ausweisen – dank eines Tricks.
[…]
Matthias Brendel und Sebastian Jost – Die Welt
A Complete Guide to European Bail-Out Facilities – Part 2: Target2 & EFSF / ESM
Veröffentlicht: 6. September 2013 Abgelegt unter: Collective Action Clauses (CAC), EFSF, ESM, IWF - IMF, Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT), Primary Market Support Facility (PMSF), Secondary Market Support Facility (SMSF), Securities Markets Program (SMP), Target-2 | Tags: Art. 8 des ESM-Vertrages, Art. 9 Abs. 1 des ESM-Vertrages, Contagion, ESM bail-out, Recapitalization Hinterlasse einen KommentarToday we present the Target2-system and the fiscal bail-out facilities in our series on European efforts to bail out itself.
For new readers, check out part 1
.
- Tran-European Automated Real-time Gross Settlement Express Transfer System – TARGET2
.
In order to facilitate cross-border financial transactions within the currency union an interbank payment system was constructed with the various national central banks as intermediaries.
A Spanish construction company, say, needs a new crane and buy one from one of the major German crane manufactures. We can assume the construction company got a loan from one of the rapidly expanding Spanish banks which can be used to buy German goods. The bank on the other hand cannot fund itself in international money markets and domestic savings cannot keep up with credit demand. However, they can issue a commercial paper which can be used as collateral for a loan with the Banco de España. The transaction is thus helped by the “temporary” credit line provided by Banco de España as part of the Target2 system. As an offset to the monetary financial institution (MFI) loan on the Banco de España balance sheet we find a Target2 liability.
The European Central Bank (ECB) is obviously balanced as the Banco de España liability is perfectly matched by a Bundesbank Target2 asset.
Euros created on back of dubious Spanish collateral are transferred to the German bank via the Bundesbank which get a Target2 asset as an offset. The German bank uses the claim on the Bundesbank to create a deposit for the German exporter.
This is how a Target2 imbalance is accumulated. However, in “normal” times the German exporter would save his money or invest directly in international claims. Somehow, the capital would find its way back through the chain cancelling the previous Target2 transaction.
However, if the Germans in this case were afraid of the solvency of its counterpart and capital flows dried up, Target2 claims and liabilities would never cancel. As a matter of fact, there is nothing inherent in the system that prohibits infinite Target2 claims and liabilities from accumulating.
Within the Federal Reserve System for example, any imbalance between regional Federal Reserve banks must be settled annually. No such thing exits within the ESCB-system.
Source: Bawerk.net
A long story short, the Target2 system made possible a massive unfunded capital transfer from the north to the south. The unsustainable capital consumption in the south and the pretense of saving in the north were allowed to reach unimaginable proportions.
We have looked through every one of the seventeen NCBs in order to see just how big this unintended bail-out was at the height of the crisis. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
Master Financial Assistance Facility Agreement
Veröffentlicht: 5. Mai 2013 Abgelegt unter: IRLAND, Master Financial Assistance Facility Agreements | Tags: Central Bank of Ireland Hinterlasse einen KommentarMASTER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FACILITY AGREEMENT
between
EUROPEAN FINANCIAL STABILITY FACILITY
IRELAND
as Beneficiary Member State
and
CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND
.
CONTENTS
CLAUSE PAGE
1. Definitions
2. The Master Financial Assistance Facility and Specific Facilities
3. Entry into Force and Conditions Precedent
4. Requests, Conditions to Disbursements, Financing and Disbursements
5. Representations, Warranties and Undertakings
6. Interest, Costs, Fees and Expenses
7. Repayment, Early Repayment, Mandatory Repayment and Cancellation
8. Payments
9. Events of Default
10. Information Undertakings
11. Undertakings relating to Inspections, Fraud Prevention and Audits
12. Notices
13. Miscellaneous
14. Governing Law and Jurisdiction
15. Entry into Force
16. Execution of the Agreement
17. Annexes and Schedules
Annex 1 Form of Pre-Funding Agreement
Annex 2 Form of Legal Opinion
Annex 3 List of Contacts
Schedule 1 Loan Facility: Facility Specific Terms
Annex 1 Form of Request for Funds
Annex 2 Form of Acceptance Notice
Annex 3 Form of Confirmation Notice
.
.
.
Between
EUROPEAN FINANCIAL STABILITY FACILITY
IRELAND
as Beneficiary Member State
and
CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND
AMENDMENT AGREEMENT
RELATING TO THE
LOAN FACILITY AGREEMENT
FIRST FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FACILITY
AGREEMENT
SECOND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FACILITY
AGREEMENT
and
MASTER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FACILITY
AGREEMENT
.
CONTENTS
Clause Page
1. Amendments to the Facility Agreements
2. Representations and Warranties
3. Governing Law and Jurisdiction
4. Entry Into Force
5. Execution of the Agreement
6. Interpretation and Annexes
Annex 1 Form of Legal Opinion
Annex 2 List of Contacts
.
Master Financial Assistence Facility Agreement
Veröffentlicht: 1. Januar 2013 Abgelegt unter: Knebelverträge, Master Financial Assistance Facility Agreements | Tags: Bank of Greece, Facility Specific Terms, Law and Jurisdiction, Legal Opinions, Pre-Funding Agreement Hinterlasse einen KommentarMASTER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FACILITY AGREEMENT
between
EUROPEAN FINANCIAL STABILITY FACILITY
THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC
as Beneficiary Member State
THE HELLENIC FINANCIAL STABILITY FUND
as Guarantor
and
THE BANK OF GREECE
(as amended by the Amendment Agreement dated 12 December 2012)
.
CONTENTS
CLAUSE PAGE
1. Definitions
Capitalised terms shall, unless otherwise specified in relation to a Facility in the relevant Facility Specific Terms, have the meanings set out below:
- „Acceptance Notice“ means, in relation to a Facility, EFSF’s written notice to the Beneficiary Member State in the form of the applicable Annex setting out the amount and the detailed provisional financial terms of the Financial Assistance under the relevant Facility, Instalment or Tranche that EFSF is willing to extend to the Beneficiary Member State under this Agreement and the Facility Specific Terms.
- „Aggregate Financial Assistance Amount“ has the meaning given to such term in Clause 2(1).
- „Agreement“ means this Master Financial Assistance Facility Agreement, including the Annexes and Schedules hereto (including any Facility Specific Terms entered into between the Parties and the Annexes thereto).
- „Allocated Portion“ means, in relation to Funding Instruments which cannot be rolled over or re-financed by virtue of a Market Disruption Event, the portion of such Funding Instruments allocated to the Beneficiary Member State by reference to the proportion the aggregate of the outstanding Financial Assistance Amounts provided by EFSF to the Beneficiary Member State bears to the aggregate principal amount of financial assistance provided by EFSF to all beneficiary member states which is outstanding (or by reference to such other matters as may be determined from time to time by the board of directors of EFSF).
- „Annex“ means an Annex to this Agreement and, for any Facility, any Annex to the Facility Specific Terms which are applicable to that Facility.
- „Availability Period“ for any Facility means the period specified as such in the applicable Facility Specific Terms, which shall in no case extend beyond 31 December 2014.
- „Average Maturity“ means, in relation to any Facility, the weighted average maturity of all the Tranches made available under such Facility where the maturity of each Tranche is determined by reference to its final scheduled repayment date (for Tranches where the principal is repaid in full in one single payment at its maturity) or the scheduled amortisations of Financial Assistance (or Tranches thereof) (for any Tranche the principal of which is repayable in scheduled instalments).
- „Business Day“ means a day on which the TARGET2 payment system is open for business.
- „Commission“ means the European Commission.
- „Commitment Fee“ means the fee allocated to the Beneficiary Member State in accordance with the Diversified Funding Strategy and related to
(i) the Negative Carry resulting from the issuance or roll-over of Funding Instruments by EFSF (including to fund the Liquidity Buffer)
(ii) Issuance Costs related to funding raised by EFSF that are not otherwise recoverable from the Beneficiary Member State or any other beneficiary member state and
(iii) any commitment commissions arising under DMO Lines or committed or un-committed credit lines as may be made available to EFSF, in each case according to the EFSF Funding Guidelines.
In accordance with Clause 6(2), the payment of the annual allocation to the Beneficiary Member State of a portion of EFSF’s aggregate Commitment Fee shall be made either (a) following the receipt of an invoice or (b) on the first Payment Date under any Tranche, Instalment or Financial Assistance following the determination of the amount to be paid as annual Commitment Fee, expressed as a number of basis points per annum that shall be applied over the relevant Tranche, Instalment or Financial Assistance to result in the amount of the Commitment Fee that would otherwise have been payable upon receipt of an invoice. The allocation of the Commitment Fee to a Beneficiary Member State and the level and/or the payment structure of the Commitment Fee applicable to this Agreement may be changed from time to time by the board of directors of EFSF and approved by the Guarantors. - „Confirmation Notice“ means, in relation to a Facility, EFSF’s written notice to the Beneficiary Member State substantially in the form of the applicable Annex to the relevant Facility Specific Terms setting out the definitive financial terms of the Financial Assistance under the relevant Facility, Instalment or Tranche that EFSF is willing to extend to the Beneficiary Member State under this Agreement and the Facility Specific Terms.
- „Cost of Carry“ means, in relation to Funding Instruments, the difference between (i) the interest accrued under the relevant Funding Instruments (a) in the case of a Pre-Funding Operation, during the period from the date EFSF commences incurring liability for interest under the relevant Funding Instruments under the Pre-Funding Operation until the relevant Disbursement Date (or the date on which the proceeds of the relevant Funding Instruments are used to refinance any other Funding Instruments) or, if the proceeds of the Pre-Funding Operation are not partly or entirely disbursed, until the maturity of the relevant Funding Instruments for the undisbursed proceeds, (b) in the case of amounts raised to fund the Liquidity Buffer, during the period when EFSF incurs liability for interest under the relevant Funding Instruments but is not able to recover any amount from the Beneficiary Member State or any other beneficiary member state in respect of such amount as part of the EFSF Cost of Funding under any financial assistance facility agreement, (c) in the case of any re-financing of any Financing, during the period from the date EFSF commences incurring liability for interest under the new Financing until the new Financing is disbursed (or the date on which the proceeds of the relevant Funding Instruments are used to refinance any other Funding Instruments) and (ii) any return on the proceeds of those Funding Instruments actually received by EFSF, if EFSF at its sole discretion invested the amount pre-funded, the residual amount under a Financing or the amount raised to fund the Liquidity Buffer. The Cost of Carry referred to in paragraph (a) above shall be allocated solely to the Beneficiary Member State but the Cost of Carry referred to in paragraphs (b) and (c) above shall be determined on a pooled basis in relation to the pool of short term Funding Instruments and the pool of long term Funding Instruments and allocated to the Beneficiary Member State in accordance with the Diversified Funding Strategy and the methodology for allocation of Funding Instruments agreed by the EWG and the board of directors of EFSF at the time the Cost of Carry is calculated.
- „Decision“ means the agreement of the representatives of the euro-area Member States in the Eurogroup to grant financial assistance to Greece and Council Decision 2011/734/EU of 12 July 2011 (which recast Council Decision 2010/320/EU of 10 May 2010 as amended) adopted on the basis of Articles 126(9) and 136 of TFEU.
- „Deed(s) of Guarantee“ means any deed(s) of guarantee entered into by, amongst others, the Guarantors and EFSF in accordance with the terms of the Framework Agreement.
- „Disbursement“ means a disbursement of funds to, or at the direction of, the Beneficiary Member State under a Facility (including, where permitted by the EFSF Funding Guidelines and the relevant Facility Specific Terms, by way of the payment of the subscription price or purchase price of purchased bonds or subordinated notes or the delivery of Funding Instruments issued by EFSF).
- „Disbursement Date“ means, in relation to any Financial Assistance made under any Facility by way of a Disbursement, the date on which funds or Funding Instruments issued by EFSF in respect of the relevant Financial Assistance are paid, advanced or delivered to the Beneficiary Member State (or its nominee or to any third party) in accordance with the relevant Facility Specific Terms. Each such Disbursement Date must be a date selected by EFSF which is
(i) a Business Day,
(ii) a day (other than a Saturday or Sunday) when banks are open for general business in Luxembourg and in the Beneficiary Member State,
(iii) a day which falls during the Availability Period, and
(iv) which otherwise complies with the relevant Facility Specific Terms. - „Disincentive Payment“ means 200 basis points per annum applied to the most recently provided Financial Assistance Amount to have been disbursed at the time when the Eurogroup or the EWG communicates, following the assessment by the Commission, in liaison with the ECB and the IMF, that there has been non-compliance by the Beneficiary Member State with the measures set out in the MoU which results in or would (as may be determined in writing by EFSF) have resulted in the non-provision of a subsequent Financial Assistance which was scheduled to be made under a Facility or any subsequent financial assistance facility agreement between EFSF and the Beneficiary Member State. The period of time on which the Disincentive Payment is based will run from the date of the provision of the most recently provided Financial Assistance Amount to the date of the communication to the Beneficiary Member State by the Eurogroup or the EWG of the decision regarding non-compliance which stops or would (as may be determined in writing by EFSF) have stopped a new disbursement of financial assistance. In accordance with Clause 6(10), the Disincentive Payment will be refunded in full by EFSF, together with any interest (if any) earned by EFSF from the investment of such Disincentive Payment when the provision of Financial Assistance by EFSF to the Beneficiary Member State recommence(s).
- „Diversified Funding Strategy“ has the meaning given to that term in the Framework Agreement. The Diversified Funding Strategy as adopted by EFSF contemplates the use of the Liquidity Buffer, a pool of short term Funding Instruments and a pool of long term Funding Instruments and that the methodology for allocation of Funding Instruments, funding and other costs and expenses between the Beneficiary Member State and each other beneficiary member state shall be made in accordance with the EFSF Funding Guidelines.
- „DMO Lines“ means treasury, money market or cash management operations between EFSF and the debt management agencies of euro-area Member States entered into in accordance with Article (5)(5) of the Framework Agreement.
- „ECB“ means the European Central Bank.
- „EFSF Cost of Funding“ means, in relation to any Financial Assistance under a Facility, the effective (after hedging) average cost of funding incurred by EFSF in funding such Financial Assistance as determined by EFSF and allocated to the relevant Financial Assistance pursuant to the Diversified Funding Strategy. The EFSF Cost of Funding shall be calculated by EFSF by adding
(i) EFSF’s (after hedging) average cost of funding the relevant Financial Assistance, expressed as a rate per annum; for the avoidance of doubt, in the case of discount Funding Instruments (e.g. zero-coupon notes), cost of funding shall be calculated with reference to the nominal value of the relevant discount Funding Instrument,
(ii) the annual Service Fee (with effect from the first anniversary of the Disbursement Date of the relevant Financial Assistance),
(iii) the Commitment Fee
(iv) any Guarantee Commission Fee accrued during the relevant period and
(v) any other financing costs, margin, negative carry, losses, hedging costs or other costs, fees or expenses.
Such EFSF Cost of Funding shall be adjusted to eliminate the effect of rounding in the calculation of interest on Funding Instruments in the form of bonds or notes with a fixed denomination and to take into account any difference in the periods by reference to which interest is calculated under this Agreement and under the related Funding Instruments and the proceeds of any temporary re-investment of interest receipts by EFSF when such interest periods differ. During the period of any Financing(s) which finance a particular Financial Assistance, EFSF Cost of Funding shall be calculated by reference to the cost of funds incurred by EFSF under the Financing(s) which finance the relevant Financial Assistance, adjusted as may be necessary to cover the period between the Payment Dates under the relevant Facility and interest and principal payment dates under the relevant Funding Instruments and any potential residual cost (including any continuing interest to maturity) incurred by EFSF under the Financing(s) EFSF entered into to finance the relevant Financial Assistance. - „EFSF Funding Guidelines“ means the funding strategy and guidelines of EFSF from time to time adopted by the board of directors of EFSF and approved by the Guarantors.
- „EFSF Investment Guidelines“ means the investment strategy and guidelines of EFSF from time to time adopted by the board of directors of EFSF and approved by the Guarantors.
- „ESM“ means the European Stability Mechanism to be constituted by treaty entered into between the euro-area Member States.
- „EU“ means the European Union.
- „EUR“, „euro“ and „€“ denote the single currency unit of the Participating Member States.
- „EURIBOR“ means, in relation to a period:
(a) the applicable Screen Rate; or
(b) (if no Screen Rate is available for the interest period applicable to an unpaid amount in accordance with Clause 6(3)) the average of the rates quoted by Deutsche Bank AG, BNP Paribas and Rabobank to leading banks in the European interbank market, as of 11:00 a.m. (Luxembourg time) on the date falling two TARGET Days before the first day of that period for the offering of deposits in euro for a comparable period. - „Eurogroup“ means the finance ministers from the 17 euro-area Member States.
- „Event of Default“ means an event defined in Clause 9(1) as modified in respect of any specific Financial Assistance by the Facility Specific Terms applying to the Facility under which such Financial Assistance is made available.
- „EWG“ means the Eurogroup Working Group.
- „Facility“ means each facility provided under this Agreement as more particularly referred to in Clause 2(2).
- „Facility Specific Terms“ means, from time to time, the terms specific to each Facility as set out in a Schedule to this Agreement which have been executed by the Parties to this Agreement (as such Schedule may be amended or supplemented from time to time).
- „Financial Assistance Amount“ means the aggregate principal amount of any Financial Assistance made available under a Facility, as more particularly determined in accordance with the relevant Facility Specific Terms.
- „Financial Support Provider“ means the lenders under the Loan Facility Agreement and any other sovereign State or other creditor (other than the IMF or the European Union) granting a bilateral loan to the Beneficiary Member State in conjunction with EFSF.
- „Financing“ means any financing longer than or equal to one year by way of issuing or entering into Funding Instruments comprising part of the pool of long term Funding Instruments.
- „First Interest Period“ means, with regard to any Financial Assistance provided under a Facility, the period commencing on (and including) its Disbursement Date and ending on (but excluding) the first Payment Date as specified in the relevant Confirmation Notice for that Facility.
- „Framework Agreement“ means the framework agreement entered into between the euro-area Member States and EFSF, as may be amended from time to time, which sets out, inter alia, the terms and conditions upon which EFSF may provide Financial Assistance to euro-area Member States and finance such Financial Assistance by issuing or entering into Funding Instruments backed by Guarantees issued by the Guarantors.
- „Funding Instruments“ has the meaning given to that term in the Preamble to this Agreement.
- „General Government Debt“ means indebtedness comprising general government debt as determined in accordance with the European System of Accounts 1995 („ESA 95“) as laid down by Council Regulation No (EC) 2223/96 of 25 June 1996 on the European system of national and regional accounts in the Community as amended from time to time. For the avoidance of doubt, the term General Government Debt shall be deemed to include any New Greek Bonds issued in connection with the Voluntary Liability Management Transaction.
- „Greek Bank Instruments“ means the common shares, contingent convertibles or such other instruments as EFSF may in its absolute discretion approve, in each case issued to HFSF by certain financial institutions in Greece in consideration for payments made out of the proceeds of Financial Assistance provided under
(a) the Existing Bank Recapitalisation Facility or
(b) this Agreement. - „Guarantee Commission Fee“ means ten (10) basis points per annum (or such other level of Guarantee Commission Fee as may be determined by the board of directors of EFSF and approved by the Guarantors as applicable to the Facilities from time to time) applied to the relevant Financial Assistance Amount.2
- „IMF“ means the International Monetary Fund.
- „IMF Arrangement“ means any agreement, programme, facility or other arrangement between the Beneficiary Member State and the IMF.
- „Instalment“ means for any Facility, the sums under that Facility which have been the subject of a Request for Funds and a related Acceptance Notice; an Instalment may be disbursed in one or more Tranches.
- „Interest Period“ means, in relation to any Financial Assistance provided under a Facility, the First Interest Period and each consecutive twelve (12) months period thereafter, commencing on (and including) the date of the preceding Payment Date for such Financial Assistance and ending on (but excluding) each Payment Date in each case, as determined in accordance with the relevant Facility Specific Terms for that Facility.
- „Interest Rate“ for any Instalment or Tranche means the rate at which interest will accrue on that Instalment or Tranche during each Interest Period as determined by EFSF, which is equal to the sum of (a) the EFSF Cost of Funding and (b) the Margin (if any) applicable to such Financial Assistance Amount.
- „Issuance Costs“ means any costs, fees or expenses incurred in relation to EFSF issuing or entering into Funding Instruments to finance a Financial Assistance under any Facility (including a portion of the Funding Instruments issued or entered into to fund the Liquidity Buffer) and which are due and payable on or about the date of issue of such Funding Instruments or, as applicable, the date such Funding Instruments are entered into, and any adjustment corresponding to the difference in the net proceeds of Funding Instruments due to such Funding Instruments not being issued at par value.
- „Liquidity Buffer“ means the proceeds of issuance of, or entry into, the pool of short term Funding Instruments (including, without limitation, the proceeds of issuance of, or entry into, short term notes, bills, commercial paper, treasury operations, DMO Lines, committed and un-committed credit lines and sale and repurchase operations) issued by EFSF in accordance with the EFSF Funding Guidelines and which, from time to time, have not been used to finance a Disbursement (or a disbursement to any other beneficiary member states) or to refinance an existing Pre-Funding Operation or Financing (or similar operations or financings in respect of any other beneficiary member states).
- „Loss of Interest“ means the difference (if it is a positive amount) between the amount of interest EFSF would receive at the Interest Rate (excluding for these purposes only the Margin component, if any, of the Interest Rate) on the relevant principal amount of Financial Assistance and the interest EFSF would receive (as determined by EFSF) from the reinvestment of the amounts pre-paid or repaid early in each case for the period commencing on (and including) the date of the prepayment or early repayment and ending on (but excluding) the date on which the relevant Financial Assistance was scheduled to be repaid.
- „Margin“ means, in relation to a Facility, the margin specified in the relevant Facility Specific Terms. The level of the Margin applicable to any Facility may be changed from time to time by the board of directors of EFSF and approved by the Guarantors. For the avoidance of doubt, no reimbursement or reduction in the Margin or the EFSF Cost of Funding shall apply resulting from payments of advance Margin.
- „Market Disruption Event“ means, at the time of a proposed issuance or roll-over of Funding Instruments, the occurrence of events or circumstances affecting the national or international financial, political or economic conditions or international capital markets or currency exchange rates or exchange controls which in the reasonable view of EFSF (as approved by the unanimous agreement of the Guarantors, as would be the case for the issuance of new Funding Instruments) are likely to prejudice materially the ability of EFSF to achieve a successful issue, offering or distribution of Funding Instruments or dealings in such Funding Instruments in the secondary market.
- „Master Facility“ has the meaning given to that term in Clause 2(1) of this Agreement.
- „Master Facility Agreement“ means this Agreement (but excluding the Facility Specific Terms).
- „MoU“ has the meaning given to that term in the Preamble to this Agreement.
- „Negative Carry“ means in relation to any Financial Assistance the negative Cost of Carry (if any) incurred by EFSF and allocated by EFSF to the funding of that Financial Assistance.
- „Net Disbursement Amount“ means, in relation to any Financial Assistance under a Facility, the Financial Assistance Amount thereof less the sum of (without double counting):
(a) any Issuance Costs;
(b) any portion of the Service Fee which is to be deducted up-front; and
(c) any costs, fees, expenses, interest (including pre-paid interest or discount) or costs of Negative Carry, incurred under or in connection with that Financial Assistance, any other Financial Assistance provided by EFSF to the Beneficiary Member State or any Pre-Funding Operation. - „New Greek Bonds“ means the sovereign bonds issued by Greece in connection with the Voluntary Liability Management Transaction.
- „Participating Member States“ means the member states of the European Union that have the euro as their lawful currency in accordance with the legislation of the European Union relating to Economic and Monetary Union.
- „Payment Date“ means, in relation to any Financial Assistance, Instalment or Tranche made available under a Facility, each scheduled date for payment of principal, interest or fees due to EFSF, as specified in the Confirmation Notice related to such Financial Assistance, Instalment or Tranche.3
- „Pre-Funding Agreement“ means an agreement substantially in the form of Annex 1 executed by the Beneficiary Member State and EFSF to authorise EFSF to enter into Pre-Funding Operations
(i) prior to the receipt of a Request for Funds or
(ii) following a receipt of a Request for Funds but in the absence of the approval of the EWG referred to in Clause 4(4) (or prior to the satisfaction of any of the other conditions to disbursement) and the issuance of an Acceptance Notice. - „Pre-Funding Operation“ means an advanced borrowing transaction as described in Clause 4(7) pursuant to which EFSF, if it deems necessary and with the agreement of the Beneficiary Member State, issues or enters into Funding Instruments to pre-finance a specific Financial Assistance on the basis of a Pre-Funding Agreement, which Pre-Funding Operation may occur prior to the time when the conditions precedent to the disbursement of such Financial Assistance are satisfied.
- „Relevant Indebtedness“ means all indebtedness which constitutes General Government Debt (including all indebtedness of the Beneficiary Member State) denominated or payable in any currency.
- „Request for Funds“ means the Beneficiary Member State’s request for a disbursement of funds under a Facility to be made in the form specified in the Facility Specific Terms applying to the Facility under which such request is to be made.
- „Schedule“ means a Schedule to this Agreement.
- „Screen Rate“ means the percentage rate per annum determined by the Banking Federation of the European Union for the relevant period, displayed on the appropriate page of the Reuters screen. If the agreed page is replaced or service ceases to be available, EFSF may specify another page or service displaying the appropriate rate after consultation with the Beneficiary Member State.
- „Service Fee“ represents the source of general revenues and resources to cover operational costs of EFSF, comprising
(i) the upfront service fee of 50 basis points calculated (without double counting) on the Financial Assistance Amount under an Instalment or Tranche and
(ii) the annual service fee of 0.5 basis points per annum, which will accrue day to day on the Aggregate Financial Assistance Amount under each Facility in each Interest Period with effect from the first anniversary of the Disbursement Date of such Financial Assistance (or such other fee level or date as may be agreed between the Parties following a decision by the EWG). The upfront service fee shall be paid in arrear by the Beneficiary Member State upon receipt of an invoice from EFSF or shall be deducted from the amount to be disbursed to the Beneficiary Member State under any Facility provided on the terms of this Agreement. The inclusion of the annual service fee as a component of the EFSF Cost of Funding is without prejudice to any faculty of a Beneficiary Member State to treat this fee as an operating cost in its national accounts. The level of the Service Fee applicable to the Facilities may be changed from time to time by the board of directors of EFSF and approved by the Guarantors. For the avoidance of doubt, the Service Fee covers and replaces any advance Margin EFSF would otherwise be entitled to charge. - „Stepping-Out Guarantor“ means a Guarantor whose request to suspend its obligation to issue Guarantees under the Framework Agreement has been accepted by the other Guarantors.
- „TARGET Day“ means any day on which TARGET2 is open for the settlement of payments in euro.
- „TARGET2“ means the Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross Settlement Express Transfer payment system which utilises a single shared platform and which was launched on 19 November 2007.
- „Term“ means the tenor of any Financial Assistance provided under a Facility which may not exceed the period from the Disbursement Date of the relevant Financial Assistance to the final Payment Date specified in the relevant Confirmation Notice.
- „Tranche“ means a part or the whole of an Instalment, as the case may be, and may be financed until its final maturity from the Liquidity Buffer or by one or more Financings.
2. The Master Financial Assistance Facility and Specific Facilities
3. Entry into Force and Conditions Precedent
4. Requests, Conditions to Disbursements, Financing and Disbursements
5. Representations, Warranties and Undertakings
6. Interest, Costs, Fees and Expenses
7. Repayment, Early Repayment, Mandatory Repayment and Cancellation
8. Payments
9. Events of Default
10. Information Undertakings
11. Undertakings relating to Inspections, Fraud Prevention and Audits
12. Notices
13. Guarantee and Indemnity
14. Miscellaneous
15. Governing Law and Jurisdiction
16. Entry into force
17. Execution of the Agreement
18. Annexes and Schedules
Annex 1 Form of Pre-Funding Agreement
Annex 2 Forms of Legal Opinions
Annex 3 List of Contacts
Schedule 1 Loan Facility: Facility Specific Terms
.
Euro-Rettungsschirm verliert „Aaa“
Veröffentlicht: 1. Dezember 2012 Abgelegt unter: EFSF, ESM | Tags: EFSF, ESM, Klaus Regling, Moody's Hinterlasse einen KommentarEuro-Rettungsschirm verliert „Aaa“
Nach den jüngsten Fortschritten bei der Griechenland-Hilfe muss Europa in der Schuldenkrise wieder einen Rückschlag hinnehmen: Der Euro-Rettungsschirm büßt sein Spitzenrating ein. Die Agentur Moody’s senkte die Bonitätsnoten von ESM und EFSF von „Aaa“ um eine Stufe auf „Aa1“. Der Ausblick für beide Hilfsinstrumente bleibt negativ, das heißt, es drohte eine weitere Absenkung.
N-TV
GR-Schulden sollen mit neuen Schulden aus dem EFSF finanziert werden
Veröffentlicht: 22. November 2012 Abgelegt unter: EFSF, GRIECHENLAND / GREECE | Tags: EFSF, GRIECHENLAND / GREECE, Münchhausen, Umschuldung 2 KommentareGR-Schulden sollen mit neuen Schulden aus dem EFSF finanziert werden
Bei der EU herrschte am Mittwochabend eine gewisse Erleichterung: Offenbar hat man einen neuen Weg gefunden, den Griechen genügend Mittel zur Verfügung zu stellen, damit sie ihre laufenden Schulden bei der EZB und den europäischen Banken bedienen können. Die neuen Kredite sollen nun vom EFSF kommen.
[…]
DWN
+
Anmerkung
Bei diesem tollem Modell erinnert man sich an Hieronymus Carl Friedrich von Münchhausen, der sich am eigenen Schopfe aus dem Sumpf zog:
Bildrechte: gemeinfrei, Genehmigung: PD-old
.
In diesem Zusammenhang empfiehlt sich auch ein Blick in die vom EFSF veröffentlichten
Financial Statements, Management report and Auditor’s report per 31 Dezember 2011 [PDF – 42 Seiten].
SIE WERDEN SICH DIE AUGEN REIBEN!
Ihr Oeconomicus
+
follow-up, 22.11.2012, 19:00h
Kommentar von Malte Kreutzfeldt zu Merkel’s Griechenland-Politik:
„Deutschland opfert Europa dem Wahlkampf“
TAZ
Europäischer Rat – Gipfelerklärung der Mitglieder des Euro-Währungsgebiets
Veröffentlicht: 29. Juni 2012 Abgelegt unter: Banken-Union, EFSF, ESM, Verschuldung | Tags: Banken-Rekapitalisierung Ein Kommentar„Wir bekräftigen, dass es von ausschlaggebender Bedeutung ist,
den Teufelskreis zwischen Banken und Staatsanleihen zu durchbrechen.“
Auf dem Gipfeltreffen der Mitglieder des Euro-Währungsgebiets vom 29. Juni 2012 haben die Staats- und Regierungschefs beschlossen,
.
-
einen einheitlichen Bankenaufsichtsmechanismus unter Führung der Europäischen Zentralbank einzurichten und, sobald dieser Mechanismus geschaffen ist,
-
dem ESM die Möglichkeit zu geben, Banken direkt zu rekapitalisieren.
.
Die Rekapitalisierung der spanischen Banken würde zunächst noch nach den derzeit geltenden Regeln erfolgen, d.h. dass die Mittel von der EFSF bereitgestellt werden, bis der ESM zur Verfügung steht.
Sie werden dann auf den ESM übertragen, ohne den Status der Vorrangigkeit zu erhalten.
Es wurde auch vereinbart, dass EFSF/ESM-Mittel flexibel zum Kauf von Anleihen von Mitgliedstaaten genutzt werden können, die Folgendes einhalten:
.
- die sie betreffenden länderspezifischen Empfehlungen;
- ihre anderen Verpflichtungen, einschließlich der jeweiligen Fristvorgaben im Rahmen des Europäischen Semesters, des Stabilitäts- und Wachstumspakts bzw. des Verfahrens bei einem übermäßigen Ungleichgewicht.
.
Diese Beschlüsse werden von der Euro-Gruppe bis zum 9. Juli 2012 umgesetzt.
.
Quelle: Europäischer Rat — vollständiger Text der Erklärung (PDF)